Covidence website will be inaccessible as we upgrading our platform on Monday 23rd August at 10am AEST, / 2am CEST/1am BST (Sunday, 15th August 8pm EDT/5pm PDT) 

Select a review framework

When developing your eligibility it is important that the entire team is clear on the criteria. Clarity on how eligibility criteria are applied is essential for consistent application by the research team.There are many frameworks that can be used to establish your eligibility (inclusion and exclusion) criteria and inform your search strategy. The most commonly used framework for intervention systematic reviews is:

picot

You might want to add the setting or context, or the study design to your eligibility criteria.  Some frameworks are more useful for observational or qualitative reviews. Other common frameworks include:

  • PEO Population Exposure Outcome
  • PECOT Population Exposure Context Outcome
  • SPIDER Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type (Cooke et al. 2012)
  • SPICE Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation (Booth 2006)

Not only will the review framework help you clearly set out your research question and eligibility criteria but it will also be useful in the development of your search strategy.

 

Click here to go back to Covidence Academy.

Already have an account? Sign in and start screening!

Explore more resources.

Share...

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Perhaps you'd also like...

Full text screening
Academy

Full Text Screening

Full text screening is the next step following title and abstract screening. Full text screening ensures that the included studies in the systematic review are 

Read More →

Better systematic review management

By using our site you consent to our use of cookies to measure and improve our site’s performance. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.