Covidence website will be inaccessible as we upgrading our platform on Monday 23rd August at 10am AEST, / 2am CEST/1am BST (Sunday, 15th August 8pm EDT/5pm PDT)
Never miss an update, subscribe to our blog mailing list.
Why Screening Matters: Ensuring Relevance, Consistency, and Quality. The key to High-Quality Evidence Synthesis. Systematic reviews are key to evidence-based practice, helping researchers, and policymakers
Our community team is made up of experts who excel in systematic reviews and research. Each member brings extensive knowledge, experience, and a passion for
Full text screening is the next step following title and abstract screening. Full text screening ensures that the included studies in the systematic review are
By identifying the reasons for low inter-rater reliability, steps can be taken to address them and improve the consistency and accuracy of the ratings.
If you are using a dual-reviewer approach to screening there will inevitably be a disagreement in voting. This is known as a ‘conflict’. Conflicts arise
Reliable collection of data is important for assessing the accuracy of a systematic or other type of literature review. This academy article explains how inter-rater
So if you think systematic reviews are just for the domain of Medical and Health Sciences – you are wrong. Researchers Researchers are looking at
Intervention reviews play a crucial role in evaluating the effectiveness of specific treatments, programs, or approaches. But how do intervention reviews relate to systematic reviews?
Systematic reviews are considered the most reliable source of evidence for decision making because they apply prespecified criteria to a synthesis of all the information
Systematic reviews are generally considered the most reliable source of evidence for decision making because they apply prespecified scientific methods to a synthesis of all